Re: How to get started using GWL 0.2.0

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Jelle Licht <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>> I fixed the bug locally, but I want to add a few more tests for that
>> part of the code before pushing it.
>
> I'd still like to play around with any (temporary) workaround you might
> have. Would you be willing share it as a patch that I can apply locally?

Oh, certainly.  The reason for the bug is that I didn’t bother testing
workflows without any inputs.  The temporary workaround is to add an
input, even if you aren’t using it:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
process hello-world
  inputs "/tmp"
  # { echo "Hello, world!" }

workflow do-the-thing
  processes hello-world
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Sorry about this!

-- 
Ricardo