[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Auto-create processe's output-path?
From: |
Olivier Dion |
Subject: |
Re: Auto-create processe's output-path? |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:26:40 -0400 |
On Mon, 06 Jun 2022, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> Olivier Dion <olivier.dion@polymtl.ca> writes:
>
>> I have a pipeline of processes. These are all templated and I generate
>> hundreds of these pipelines with different parameters. Everything is
>> auto-connected with inputs/outputs matching. What is important to me is
>> that all inputs/outputs of a pipeline are separated in different
>> directories.
>>
>> Setting a working directory that is parameterizable for the processes
>> would do this cleanly and I believe would also work in a containerized
>> environment.
>
> This sounds like a good idea. Better than “output-path”, which is hard
> to understand, conceptually collides with “outputs”, and is used as a
> prefix. Specifying a working directory sounds like an improvement.
>
> Would you like to add a patch to that effect?
Yes. I'll send a patch soon!
--
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev