[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document
From: |
hemppah |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:12:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
Lainaus Tuomas Lukka <address@hidden>:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:18:26PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > Quoting Tuomas Lukka <address@hidden>:
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this kind of model possible in Gzz p2p ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you see any reason it would not be?
> > > >
> > > > My initial reactions is that this is possible.
> > > >
> > > > However, I'm not 100% sure about this, because you and Benja have
> > > mentioned
> > > > sometimes something about fixed block lengths and I don't *really*
> know,
> > > in
> > > > practice, what do you mean by it (yes, it's a fixed size..but), and
> how
> > > it
> > > > differs from Overnet's scenario (?).
> > >
> > > I have no idea what you're talking about ;)
> > >
> >
> > Let's put this in another way: Is it possible to fragment Storm blocks
> (e.g.
> > each block consists of number of fixed-size "miniblocks", say A, B and C,
> and
> > they each have a unique hash, like in Tiger-tree hashing) to different
> > "mini-blocks" so that we are able to fetch these "mini-blocks" from
> different
> > sources (for more efficient download when fetching *big* blocks) ? If the
> answer
> > is yes, I don't see any reasons why we are not able to implement
> Overnet-like
> > block fetching in Gzz.
> >
> > Comments ?
>
> The problem is finding the hashes of the miniblocks from the block id: if
> someone
> gets to do this in a hostile way you could download a lot of miniblocks to
> discover
> in the end that you got a lot of garbage, because one of the miniblocks is
> wrong.
Hmm...I think this is handled somehow in Overnet. I don't know the details,
though.
Btw, two interesting links:
http://jigle.com/
http://www.sharereactor.com/fakesearch.php
Please do not pay attention to a content (part of content is illegal)!!!
Instead, the idea is interesting and at least somelevel *working*.
-Hermanni
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, (continued)
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document,
hemppah <=
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, b . fallenstein, 2002/12/16
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/17
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, b . fallenstein, 2002/12/17
- Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, hemppah, 2002/12/18
Re: [Gzz] hemppah's research problems document, B. Fallenstein, 2002/12/14