[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [help-3dldf] Re: all intersections between two paths *
From: |
Martijn van Manen |
Subject: |
Re: [help-3dldf] Re: all intersections between two paths * |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:14:39 -0500 |
Hi Laurence and others,
It seems my "mathematical knowledge" - in as far as we
can speak of it, is considered more important than it
actually is. I'm doing my best, but I'll honestly admit that
with the 70 hour working week little time is left.
Currently I try to get the intersections of conic sections
right.
After that there are the reflection groups/stellations/facetting.
If there is any other priority to take tell me.
I would like to give my opinion about some things.
The most popular drawing program among mathematicians
is the infamous "xfig". What one would want for 3DLDF is
some user interface, to make it easier to code that stuff.
That would make your program so much more popular.
It should be targeted towards use with latex. Latex is
the formatting program of choice in theoretical physics/mathematics
and fairly popular in other exact domains.
That is a priority as far as I know, but then, what
I know is very little.
GRTZ,
Martijn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laurence Finston" <address@hidden>
To: "Martijn van Manen" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [help-3dldf] Re: all intersections between two paths *
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:23:33 +0100 (MET)
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Martijn van Manen wrote:
>
> > I think those Bezier curves are of degree 3, aren't they?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Bezout's theorem tells you that [...]
>
> Thanks for the explanation. For 3DLDF, I'm not that
> concerned at the moment about the intersections of arbitrary
> `paths'. I only brought it up in the context of the
> discussion resulting from Antonio Ramirez' original
> question. I would like to implement them, but the
> intersections of geometrical figures that we've discussed
> before have a higher priority.
>
> I've looked through some books on NURBs, and decided that
> I'd like to read Tiller and Piegl's _The NURBs Book_. It
> is, however, quite long. The parser is already in a fairly
> finished state, and I'm not yet entirely sure what I want to
> work on next. There are a couple of features that don't
> require me to learn much new material, such as routines for
> writing and reading fast-loading base files. My lack of
> mathematical knowledge is the bottleneck for some of the
> other features I'd like to implement.
>
> > Happy new year all of you.
>
> I wish the same to you and all the other subscribers.
>
> > I've begun working on the
> > next installment of my pondering on 3DLDF.
> >
>
> Thanks, I look forward to hearing about it.
>
>
> Laurence
Mieulx est de ris que de larmes escripre,
Pour ce que rire est le propre de l'homme.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm