[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem
From: |
Laurence Finston |
Subject: |
[help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:28:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
IMHO/0.98.3+G (Webmail for Roxen) |
Larry Siebenmann wrote:
> Geometers like to avoid this sort of hair splitting by discussing
> generic cases only.
>
> Whether programmers can afford to do likewise is a good question.
They cannot. I have occasionally met with an attitude among mathematicians
and physicists, that once they'd proven that a solution existed, they had
solved the problem, upon which they lost interest. From my point of view,
that's just the beginning. I have almost never implemented any non-trivial
feature in any program without having to revise my theory. Sometimes, I've
even had to revise my views about what was trivial and what wasn't.
Incidentally, the balance between the theoretical and the practical is one of
the things I admire most about Knuth's work.
Laurence
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Laurence Finston, 2005/04/22
- Re: [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Laurence Finston, 2005/04/23
- Re: [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Martijn van Manen, 2005/04/23
- Re: [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, L. Nobre G., 2005/04/24
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem,
Laurence Finston <=
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Laurence Finston, 2005/04/24
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Peter Vanroose, 2005/04/26
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Peter Vanroose, 2005/04/27
- [help-3dldf] Re: button-hole problem, Peter Vanroose, 2005/04/27