[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `printf %q` but more human readable
From: |
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev |
Subject: |
Re: `printf %q` but more human readable |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Mar 2021 16:36:29 +0100 |
i see, well formed words
in this case i'd simplify, code on purpose
i still dont know 1 of your cases so cant continue, a code formatizer is
out of my scope
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 4:33 PM Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 9:52 AM Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > sounds to me like a [too] big thing to code
> > a tokenizer to internal codes then to output format
>
> It is a balance of code complexity and the corner cases that it
> covers. At least, I have a bash implementation that covers some common
> cases. So the question is, if not all cases can be covered perfectly
> in bash, what are other common cases that should be covered and how to
> cover them without introducing too much code complexity and slowing
> down the code for common cases too much.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peng
>
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, (continued)
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Marco Ippolito, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Marco Ippolito, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Pier Paolo Grassi, 2021/03/15
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Peng Yu, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable, Peng Yu, 2021/03/14
- Re: `printf %q` but more human readable,
Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <=