[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: snacc
From: |
Laurence Finston |
Subject: |
RE: snacc |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 00:25:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
IMHO/0.98.3+G (Webmail for Roxen) |
This is the same problem you had before. When you call `make' with no
argument, it uses the default target, usually (or maybe always) the first
target in the makefile. This is `all-redirect', which is presumably
generated automatically by `automake', but which doesn't have a rule to go
along with it. I don't know why not.
Please try calling `make all' and/or `make install' and let me know what
happens.
Laurence
-------------------
> Hi Laurence,
> when I ran configure in my /usr/local/bin/SNACC directory, it came back to a
> prompt without any errors. It appeared to be ok to me.
>
> After that happened, I type "make" from the prompt and got the following
> message. I don't understand what the make is looking for.
>
> # make
> No suffix list.
> Make: Don't know how to make all-redirect. Stop.
> #
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurence Finston [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 3:10 PM
> To: Alvin Weigel
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: snacc
>
>
> Hi Alvin,
>
> Please leave `help-bison' on the "cc" if you reply.
>
> I looked at your logs. `configure' clearly succeeded, since it exited with
> 0
> as its exit status, so I don't understand what the problem is now. Some of
> the tests didn't succeed, but nothing jumped out at me as being important.
> Did `configure' issue an error message when you ran it? Or did `automake'
> or
> `make' fail?
>
> I just searched for "snacc" on the internet and discovered a few websites
> and
> mailing lists. Have you asked for help from anyone involved with `snacc'
> itself?
>
> Laurence
>
>
>
>
- RE: snacc, Laurence Finston, 2004/08/20
- RE: snacc, Alvin Weigel, 2004/08/20
- RE: snacc,
Laurence Finston <=
- RE: snacc, Laurence Finston, 2004/08/21