[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x + (y) + z
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: x + (y) + z |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:28:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6 |
At 18:12 +0000 2005/03/06, Derek M Jones wrote:
>Unfortunately glr parsing is not a universal solution. It requires that
>at the end of processing there be a unique parse tree (the multiple
>parse trees that may exist while processing the input tokens are required
>to eventually resolve to a single parse).
You can try using %merge, and then in the merge action function build in the
split-parse info. (For example, registering the different parses.)
Hans Aberg
- Re: x + (y) + z, (continued)
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/07
- Re: x + (y) + z, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/08
- Re: x + (y) + z, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/03/09
- Ambiguity involving two parse stacks reducing on the same rule, Derek M Jones, 2005/03/09
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/06
Re: x + (y) + z,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/07
Re: x + (y) + z, Hans Aberg, 2005/03/07