[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
Frank Heckenbach |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:50:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
semail 20050409 |
Akim Demaille wrote:
> Maybe that does not deserve that much attention: it seems pretty weird
> not to use a value. A warning seems a better feature.
I sometimes attach some kinds of flags (integer type) to some
symbols that I need in some, but not all, rules that use that
symbol. So, if you go for the warning, could you please make it
optional? (I think it would be a useful feature in general,
including several of my grammars, but in some cases I'd probably
prefer to turn it off.)
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, address@hidden
http://fjf.gnu.de/
GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)
Re: %destructor feedback, Paul Eggert, 2005/10/18
Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/10/20
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/10/20
- Re: %destructor feedback,
Frank Heckenbach <=
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/10/21
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/10/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/10/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/10/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/10/22
Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/10/20