[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unmaintained package?
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: unmaintained package? |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:05:02 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Well, who would I talk to about modifying bison to be used in an
> asynchronous manner?
I'm not a maintainer, so not me.
My suggestion would have been to post to this list, which the maintainers
do read. Maybe if you start over with a subject that mentions
`asynchronous', your email will be more apt to catch the eye of someone
who's interested in this feature.
Joel
- unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/15
- Re: unmaintained package?, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/15
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/18
- Re: unmaintained package?,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/22
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/29
Re: unmaintained package?, Hans Aberg, 2005/12/19