[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR
From: |
Paul Hilfinger |
Subject: |
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:02:19 -0800 |
> > Let's say instead
> >
> > In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
>
> I was trying to leave the door open for others to pursue this feature
> because, even though it doesn't interest me, it might be reasonable. But
> `undefined' seems accurate.
Actually, I kind of think of "undefined" as a leaving-the-door-open-but-
not-promising-anything sort of word.
> OK to leave the comment?
Yes.
> I'm happy to drop `Note that', which seems redundant. Other than that, I
> prefer my wording because `it is also' creates a smoother transition from
> the previous paragraphs. Is that OK?
Sure.
Paul Hilfinger
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/06
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/10
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/11
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Hilfinger, 2006/01/11
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR,
Paul Hilfinger <=
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/11
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/12
- Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Joel E. Denny, 2006/01/30
Re: incorrect yychar for unambiguous GLR, Paul Hilfinger, 2006/01/11