|
From: | Hans Aberg |
Subject: | Re: how to handle large varible sized semanitc values (in C-basedparsers)? |
Date: | Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:21:00 +0200 |
On 10 Jul 2007, at 19:21, Steve Murphy wrote:
One idea of using %union is to save space, so it would no longer apply with your definition, as the "union" takes up at least the size of its smallest member.
You mean, methinks, the size of its biggest member...?
Sure; sorry for the typo. Hans Aberg
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |