[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grammar for propositional logic
From: |
Martin McDermott |
Subject: |
Re: grammar for propositional logic |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 02:25:41 -0400 |
Any comments on why I would be getting a syntax error?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:50 AM, John P. Hartmann <address@hidden>wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: John P. Hartmann <address@hidden>
> Date: 1 September 2010 07:49
> Subject: Re: grammar for propositional logic
> To: Martin McDermott <address@hidden>
>
>
> You should inspect the .output file to resolve your conflicts. For
> something as simple as yours, you should have zero tolerance for
> conflicts, even shift/reduce.
>
> As a minimum you need to deal with operator associativity and precedence.
>
> %left T_OR T_XOR
> %left T_AND
>
> Might be what you want, if AND binds closer than OR.
>
> j.
>
> _______________________________________________
> address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
>
- grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Alfonso Urdaneta, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Fwd: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic,
Martin McDermott <=
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, Martin McDermott, 2010/09/01
- Re: grammar for propositional logic, John P. Hartmann, 2010/09/01
Re: grammar for propositional logic, Hans Aberg, 2010/09/01