[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: header file guards conflict
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: header file guards conflict |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2012 16:02:10 +0200 |
Le 21 mai 2012 à 15:41, Hans Aberg a écrit :
> On 21 May 2012, at 11:34, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
>>> Is there a better way to do it?
>>
>> This is indeed a problem. I'm sure what the best way to
>> address this is. In addition, in some cases, creating the
>> files location.hh, stack.hh etc. is more troublesome than
>> useful.
>
> Perhaps add infixes 'loc', 'stk', etc., so that a parser with name <name>
> gets files
> <name>.loc.h
> <name>.stk.h
> etc.
Actually I want to have stack.hh disapear (it does not
need to be exposed). It's a good idea though for the
others, but since people want to be able to rename,
it shall be more general.
position.hh does not need to exist either, it can live
within location.hh.
- Re: header file guards conflict, (continued)
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/22
- RFC: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: RFC: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/22
Re: header file guards conflict, Wei Song, 2012/05/21
Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Akim Demaille, 2012/05/21
- Re: header file guards conflict, Hans Aberg, 2012/05/21