[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Help with bisonc++(1)
From: |
Kip Warner |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Help with bisonc++(1) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:40:34 -0700 |
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 17:46 +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Kip,
Hey Akim,
> I would be very interested in knowing what features Bison++
> offers that Bison does not. Yes, you are right, Bison generated
> C files first, and C++ was added later. Yet, the C++ skeletons
> were designed, they are not just C code put into a C++ class.
>
> If you saw shortcomings in Bison’s C++ output, please let us
> know, and we’ll see what we can do.
It's actually been a while since I was working on my project's parser.
As you may have noticed, my post was from about a year
ago. Unfortunately it's been too long to recall any details, but if
they come to mind I will let you know.
PS I should also point out that bison++(1) and bisonc++(1) are
different with the latter more recently maintained.
--
Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer
OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred
https://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part