[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Puzzler: Can cfengine replace make?
From: |
Ronan KERYELL |
Subject: |
Re: Puzzler: Can cfengine replace make? |
Date: |
07 Nov 2001 08:38:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:12:43 +0100 (MET), Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no said:
Mark> The question of whether cfengine can replace make is perhaps not
Mark> as important as whether it should. Similarly one can ask whether
Mark> make should or can replace cfengine.
Mark> Clearly make and cfengine are two different things, designed for
Mark> quite different purposes. As Ted showed, and Jon added, it is
Mark> possible to do all kinds of make-like things with cfengine,
Mark> provided one thinks in a "cfengine way". Trying to make cfengine
Mark> work like make is cumbersome and it's best to think in a more
Mark> cfengine kind of way.
For me the important questions are :
- is cfengine an open and extensible tool to fit user needs ?
- how to add easily new features in cfengine such as make behaviour for
example ?
I'm thinking to that in my PCFengine project...
--
Ronan KERYELL |\/
Labo Informatique Télécom |/) Tel: (+33|0) 2.29.00.14.15
ENST Bretagne, BP832 K Fax: (+33|0) 2.29.00.12.82
29285 PLOUZANE CEDEX |\ E-mail: Ronan.Keryell@enst-bretagne.fr
FRANCE | \ http://www-info.enst-bretagne.fr/~keryell