[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radmind vs CFengine
From: |
Systems Administrator |
Subject: |
Re: Radmind vs CFengine |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:02:40 +1100 (EST) |
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, John Sechrest wrote:
> It would be a very good exercise (left to someone else who
> can think it thru) to create a cfengine process/script
> that mimics the radmind approach and then to do a comparision.
>
> It may infact provide an entry way for people just starting
> out into a using the system faster. The learning curve
> on cfengine is steep enough that there is a group who
> balk at it.
I can relate to this -- I'm going to persevere, but if I had the
thing he's talking about, it'd be great :). OTOH, I don't have time to do
it :).
> Lots and lots and lots of simple templates would
> help at one level, but the radmind approach is interesting
> because it is a templating process in itself.
Speaking of which, is there a central repository of sample
cfengine scripts? CfPAN anyone?
:)
--
Tim Nelson
Systems Administrator
Sunet Internet
Tel: +61 3 5241 1155
Fax: +61 3 5241 6187
Web: http://www.sunet.com.au/
Email: sysadmin@sunet.com.au
Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Kurt Lieber, 2004/01/07
- RE: Radmind vs CFengine, Wheeler, John, 2004/01/09
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Chip Seraphine, 2004/01/09
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Systems Administrator, 2004/01/11
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Mark . Burgess, 2004/01/12
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Chip Seraphine, 2004/01/12
- Re: Radmind vs CFengine, Holger Schurig, 2004/01/12
- "CfPAN" library (was Re: Radmind vs CFengine), Chip Seraphine, 2004/01/12