[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Order of Execution
From: |
Christian Pearce |
Subject: |
Re: Order of Execution |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:25:28 -0500 |
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 13:12, Ed Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 06:34, Christian Pearce wrote:
>
> > cfagent.conf
> > control:
> > actionsequence = ( copy shellcommands shellcommands.secondrun )
>
> In my experience, if you qualify any action, you had better qualify them
> all. The above is misleading in that if you move the unqualified
> 'shellcommands' after 'shellcommands.secondrun' it does not change the
> actionsequence. In other words, this does not work:
>
> actionsequence = ( shellcommands.firstrun shellcommands )
I am well aware of this. It is good you brought it up. I tried
explaining in, but I wasn't clear. Others should be made painly aware
of this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-cfengine mailing list
> Help-cfengine@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
--
Christian Pearce
http://www.commnav.com
http://www.perfectorder.com
- Order of Execution, Brian E. Seppanen, 2005/01/05
- Re: Order of Execution, Pau Capdevila/Upcnet, 2005/01/05
- Re: Order of Execution, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/01/05
- Re: Order of Execution, Christian Pearce, 2005/01/05
- Actionsequence as a top level section, Chip Seraphine, 2005/01/05
- actionsequence suggestion, Ed Brown, 2005/01/06
- Re: actionsequence suggestion, Mark . Burgess, 2005/01/06
- Re: actionsequence suggestion, Tim Nelson, 2005/01/10
- Re: actionsequence suggestion, Brendan Strejcek, 2005/01/10
- Re: actionsequence suggestion, Ed Brown, 2005/01/10
- Re: actionsequence suggestion, John Borwick, 2005/01/10