[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:50:53 -0600 |
> > No route to host =3D firewall?
> No. The hosts in question are simply not running, but on the same
> subnet. That's OK though, because they're workstations whose users are
> not in today.
>
> But that's not the point. The point is that cfrun prints
>
> > > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket
> > > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host
>
> three times although the hosts ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de,
> ls-bs-ws7.bs.linet-services.de and ls-bs-ws8.bs.linet-services.de are
> the ones that aren't reachable. The output above is
> useless. ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de is up and reachable, tested with
> "cfrun ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de" (in fact, it is the host on which
> I run "cfrun").
I think "cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de" means "cfrun running
on ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de". So the error above means
"cfrun running on ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de couldn't open a
socket [to the host it's hailing]"
Try setting OutputPrefix = ( ":" )
steve
- - -
systems & network manager
high energy physics
university of wisconsin
Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts, David Douthitt, 2005/02/25