Re: Defining classes in update.conf that are seen by cfagent.conf?

[nathan r. hruby]

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Tim Nelson wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to define a class in the update.conf that will be carried
> > over to cfagent.conf? This doesn't seem to be the case right now.
> > Specifically a define= on a copy command? Would autodefine work in this
> > case, eg would an autodefine in cfagent.conf pick up on a copy that
> > happened in the update phase?
>
> 	I can't think of anything non-klugy (ie. make a file in update.conf, 
> and check it in cfagent.conf), but have you considered moving that particular 
> copy to your cfagent.conf (and use actionsequence to put it at the very 
> start)?

Huh.  Could you use SetState() to simply define a call that would carry
over?

http//www.cfengine.org/docs/cfengine-Anomalies.html#Persistent-alerts

-n
--
-------------------------------------------
nathan hruby <nhruby@uga.edu>
uga enterprise information technology services
production systems support
metaphysically wrinkle-free
-------------------------------------------