[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#64957: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-fontmake.
From: |
Sergio Pastor Pérez |
Subject: |
Re: bug#64957: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-fontmake. |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Sep 2023 19:22:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 30.0.50 |
Hi, again.
When I submitted the package I thought the checks where passing at least
it was building without errors for version 3.4.0. I see that you are
using another build system and you updated the version. I'm trying your
patch out and I see the failures during the check phase.
At first sight I would not know how to fix any of this. I'm not very
experienced with python in general. If I find the problem I will send an
updated revision.
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> reopen 64957
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
>> Sergio Pastor Pérez <sergio.pastorperez@outlook.es> writes:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (fontmake): New variable.
>
> I spoke too soon; the tests do not appear to run. Here's an updated
> package:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (define-public fontmake
> (package
> (name "fontmake")
> (version "3.7.1")
> (source (origin
> (method url-fetch)
> (uri (pypi-uri "fontmake" version ".zip"))
> (sha256
> (base32
> "0ib7fvwgwazm7qfj4a3rkqkb40xfbj40rnvsmkvl2isg2ky3vg9m"))))
> (build-system pyproject-build-system)
> (inputs (list python-fontmath python-glyphslib))
> (native-inputs (list unzip pytest python-setuptools-scm))
> (home-page "https://github.com/googlefonts/fontmake")
> (synopsis
> "Compile fonts from sources (UFO, Glyphs) to binary (OpenType,
> TrueType)")
> (description
> "Fontmake compiles fonts from various sources (@code{.glyphs},
> @code{.ufo},
> @code{designspace}) into binaries (@code{.otf}, @code{.ttf}). It can be used
> to
> create static instances and variable fonts.")
> (license license:asl2.0)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Unfortunately there are quite a few test failures to analyze. Would
> you be motivated to do so? The end result would be a better package.