Re: [Help-glpk] glpsol, arbitrary precision and large numbers

[Andrew Makhorin]

> I thought that that was the point of --exact.
> Even if the input routines are  double precision,
> the given numbers are representable.
> Perhaps there is a presolve that is not done with exact arithmetic.
> 

The --exact option is ignored for mip instances. (Probably glpsol should
issue a warning about that.)