[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnats/263
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
Re: gnats/263 |
Date: |
17 Jan 2002 12:35:08 +0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yngve Svendsen <address@hidden> writes:
> >I don't think it's a good idea to provide something that can't be
> >created with free tools.
>
> I have opinions which probably differ quite a lot from yours in that
> area, but this isn't the forum for that kind of thing.
GNATS is part of the GNU Project so this is issue is important because
any GNU program should NOT rely on any non-free tools according to GNU
standards.
Greetings,
- --
Hugo Gayosso | The ultimate result is that some
Controls Process Support | innovations that would truly
Electronics Integration and Software | benefit consumers never occur
GM Powertrain | for the sole reason that they
| do not coincide with Microsoft's
| self-interest.
|
| Thomas Penfield Jackson
| U.S. District Judge
|
DISCLAIMER:
All what I said is my own point of view, not the one of my
employer, unless it is specifically said so.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8Rn6sx2JZtTN6co8RApyuAKDIQzvKFF9ZH4DBYIGdlwDVkviEagCg9muN
u3fd+wjP8S85IO21I8FH7Nc=
=zUpI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----