[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:46:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-11-01) |
* John wrote on Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:02:32PM CET:
>
> Is there some way to avoid having to use the capital F's?
Not easily, without changes to Automake.
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > With respect to portability among compilers, this example is lacking the
> > flag for source file extensions, AC_FC_SRCEXT([F95]). I omitted it
> > because Automake does not automatically add support for it yet
> > (for .f90 and .f95, that has been added in Automake 1.10). If you need
> > this, write me, and I'll post an updated example.
>
> I use the f90 extension regardless of whether the file is f90 or f95, so
> I don't think I need to add this support.
The issue is a bit different. If you intend your project to be portable
to non-GNU compilers, then you may need this. For example for some AIX
compiler drivers (e.g., xlf95 for compiling a file named *.F90), and I
think maybe for Intel ifort as well.
Automake-1.10 support in those cases is incomplete: you will have to
override the inference rules in that case. I intend to fix this soon.
Cheers,
Ralf
- autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/10
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/11
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/12/11
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/12
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Message not available
- Re: autotools, preprocessors, and fortran 90, John, 2006/12/12