|
From: | Haniho Dude |
Subject: | Re: If FOSS isn't your number one concern, why use IceCat? |
Date: | Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:59:37 +0000 |
That sounds like an excellent step in the right direction. When all is said and done, I'd love to see the details of the results. In fact, I would've been happy with less! All I want is to know where we currently stand, but you're offering far more!
Thanks.
From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
Sent: 20 November 2019 22:34 To: Haniho Dude <address@hidden> Cc: address@hidden <address@hidden> Subject: Re: If FOSS isn't your number one concern, why use IceCat? Hi Philip,
Haniho Dude <address@hidden> wrote: > This is indeed great news; it fully addresses the original concern that > made me ask my questions. However, it does not answer the questions > themselves: > > * Other than the components that exist only to make IceCat FOSS and > the addons that any Firefox user can obtain, what does IceCat offer > that cannot be obtained by using a privacy-hardened user.js file? I'm not yet able to give a proper answer to this question, as I'm currently familiarizing myself with the privacy issues in Firefox and studying the relevant source code. I can tell you that I do not intend to limit myself to reading existing privacy guides and changing default settings (as in data/settings.js). Where appropriate, I will patch the source code itself. For example, I've already added code to the IceCat-68 preview to expose more privacy settings in a user-friendly way within <about:preferences>, and I intend to do more of that, e.g. exposing DNS-over-HTTPS configuration there. I may also modify the code to add support for new low-level settings that don't yet exist within <about:config>. For example, at present, I believe there's no way to allow _javascript_ to know your local time zone without disabling "privacy.resistFingerprinting" entirely. So, we currently have this one option that covers a great many things, and I'd like to allow more fine-grained control. That's not something that can be done in user.js as far as I know. I'm only just beginning to dig into the issues and study the code, but I expect that over time IceCat will not only have better default settings, but allow better configuration of your desired tradeoffs between privacy and functionality. Mark |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |