Re: how to separate the implementation of inline functions?

[google]

Guy Harrison wrote:
/.../
>
> struct foo {
>  /*inline*/ void bar(int&x) {++x;}
> };
>
> ...generates the same code reguardless of inline commented out or not

That'll be because C++ is *supposed* to inline functions defined within
a class declaration - the "inline" keyword is redundant in the above
code.

> - it's
> "-O" that's the trigger (there may be a specific flag, I've not
bothered to
> look).

But, as has been remarked, it's up to the compiler, ultimately, what it
chooses to inline.

Cheers,

-- 
Lionel B