|
From: | Larry I Smith |
Subject: | Re: g++ Compile Problems Using Multiple Overloaded Operators in a Matrix Class |
Date: | Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:10:20 GMT |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041220 |
Maurizio Loreti wrote:
Larry I Smith <larryXiXsmith@verizon.net> writes:Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:Lastly a thing where I differ from Larry: there is no need to check a pointer before invoking delete[] on it, as he does in the UliThis is a portability issue. Sadly, to this day, some compilers/libs on some OS'es will fault if a NULL value is passed to delete/delete[].You are in gnu.g++.help. g++ is conformant. And I do not know any current compiler/OS where delete[] barfs on a NULL pointer; can you be more specific?
Please read my reply to Ulrich's post, which asks the same question. Regards, Larry -- Anti-spam address, change each 'X' to '.' to reply directly.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |