[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: in-charge versus not-in-charge
|
From: |
Ulrich Eckhardt |
|
Subject: |
Re: in-charge versus not-in-charge |
|
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:49:25 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KNode/0.8.2 |
Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> jsju <jsju@sbcglobal.net> writes:
>
>> Does anyone knows what 'in-charge' and 'not-in-charge' means?
>
> It's an internal impelementation detail, which should not be of
> any concern to you.
I'd be interested to know anyways, you don't have a link handy, do you?
Uli
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
http://parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/