[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: perfomance of clear vs swap
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
Subject: |
Re: perfomance of clear vs swap |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:25:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
krishanu.debnath@gmail.com writes:
> I have a call to hash_map::clear() function which takes long time.
It is somewhat likely that you are mis-interpreting the results
that you observed.
It is hard to imagine a situation in which creating a hash_map
takes less time than clear()ing it.
Using g++4.0.0, creating a 10,000,000 entry hash_map takes 116
seconds on my machine; clearing via either clear() or swap() with
temporary takes 8 seconds.
> Now runtime drops significantly, 10 fold less.
> What's exactly cause this run time reduction?
User error, most likely.
If you are convinced that you really see what you claim to see,
post a complete compilable test case that demonstrates that.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.