[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: g++-2.95 statically compiling
|
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
|
Subject: |
Re: g++-2.95 statically compiling |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:34:34 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
fangee <fangee80NOSPAMNO@gmail.com> writes:
A. Because doing so makes the conversation harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?
Please do not top-post.
> Following yuor suggestion I gave up statically compiling and I found a
> better (I think) solution: pass to the linker the option -Wl,-rpath.
You never explained what problem static linking was intended
to solve. Without knowing your goal, it is impossible to tell whether
'-rpath' is a correct solution, and whether better solutions exist.
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.