[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety.
From: |
Brian Mckinnon |
Subject: |
Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety. |
Date: |
18 Apr 2007 07:17:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
> >> Is it safe to use operators 'new' and 'delete' in a multithreaded
> >> programs, that is: are those operators thread-safe in a current
> >> implementation of g++?
I'm actually having a problem with what appears to a new/delete thread
safety issue, and this is actually the second time it has happened to
me. The last time it happened to me I did a pretty heavy analysis on
the problem, and I saw that memory addresses which had been freed by
one thread were being used by another. I really wish I kept that
output file. The only way I could fix the problem was to use a thread
safe factory to create and free the memory. The original problem
happened when I was actually calling new and delete on a bunch of
objects, while my current problem occurs with a std::vector of
std::vector's.
This seems crazy to me though. The only thing I can think is that new
and delete are not thread safe, but I know that can't be true. Is
there a way to override the new and delete functions, or enable some
form of malloc debugging so I can at least try and identify the
issue.
I'm not positive about my compiler version, but it is at least 4.1.2.
- Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., ddtl, 2007/04/17
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., ddtl, 2007/04/17
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2007/04/17
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., ddtl, 2007/04/17
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety.,
Brian Mckinnon <=
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., Bernd Strieder, 2007/04/18
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., Paul Pluzhnikov, 2007/04/18
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., Brian Mckinnon, 2007/04/18
- Re: Operators 'new', 'delete' and thread safety., karsten, 2007/04/23