[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tolower - std namespace?
From: |
Taras_96 |
Subject: |
Re: tolower - std namespace? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:38:06 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Mar 15, 11:57 am, Jeff Schwab <j...@schwabcenter.com> wrote:
> sanjeev.sapk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
...
> > PS: I'm finding that writing portable code when using a STANDARD
> > library is much harder than I would think it is *sigh*
>
> What are you actually trying to do?
I'm not trying to do anything in particular. I was just making a
remark that writing code that compiles across different compilers is a
lot harder than it should be. I've read numerous posts where the
posters have voiced this opinion, and it seems that there is a bit of
leeway in the implementation of the standard (which can't make the job
an easier), as implied by this link:
http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/064.htm