[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gsl] Re: Debian and the GFDL
From: |
Joel J. Adamson <address@hidden> |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gsl] Re: Debian and the GFDL |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:50:59 -0400 |
>>>>> "Hongzheng" == Hongzheng Wang <address@hidden> writes:
Hongzheng> You seriously underestimate the contribution of Debian,
Hongzheng> even only considering the packaging of GSL. Providing
Hongzheng> pre-compiled binary packages and organizing them well is
Hongzheng> one of the merits offered by Linux distribution, which, I
Hongzheng> think, is a well known truth, right?
A package does not have to be provided by the official distributors to
be useful to users of a particular distribution. I use a package (that
is managed in an apt-like-system) for Slackware maintained by a
third-party (www.slacky.eu) packager. Slackware does not include GSL
(or Openoffice, or Gnome) because it is a low priority package and the
responsibilty lies on the users who want it, or have the means to
provide it.
A perfectly good solution would be for a third-party to package the .deb
COMPLETE with documentation and provide a link on the GSL main page.
And despite my use of a precompiled package, installing a library is
fairly trivial --- how many times are you going to waste those precious
CPU cycles? And removing it is not a big deal either, since an
installed library (at least GSL) is not a danger unless save for
conserving drive space. If the package had been unavailable, I
definitely would have compiled from source.
Joel
--
Joel J. Adamson
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB #3280, Coker Hall
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280
Before you reply to this email, please read
http://www.unc.edu/~adamsonj/roe.html