[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Help-gsl] Nelder and Mead
From: |
Mario dos Reis |
Subject: |
[Help-gsl] Nelder and Mead |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:22:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071019) |
Did you optimize your code using Nelder and Mead? i.e.
gcc myprogram myprogram.c -O4 -DHAVE_INLINE=1 -DGSL_RANGE_CHECK=0 \
-lgslcblas -lgsl
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:40:05 +0100 From: Brian Gough
<address@hidden> Subject: Re: [Help-gsl] Nelder-Mead Simplex algorithm To:
Tania Regimbau <address@hidden> Cc: address@hidden Message-ID:
<address@hidden> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII At Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:15:10 +0200, Tania Regimbau wrote:
> > I used the implementation of the GSL Nelder Mead Simplex algorithm to
> > minimize a 3 variable function and it doesn't seem to perform very
> > well compared to the Matlab function fmeansearch based on the same
> > algorithm. Can someone tell me what the difference is between the
two?
> > I thought I was using the same precision parameters but I may have
> > missed something.
I'm not aware of any major difference -- could you submit a bug report
to address@hidden with an example program and the output compared
with MATLAB. Thanks.
-- Brian Gough
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Help-gsl] Nelder and Mead,
Mario dos Reis <=