|
From: | John Pye |
Subject: | Re: [Help-gsl] Binary installer for GSL-1.13 on MinGW |
Date: | Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:48:19 +1100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
seb_kramm wrote:
John Pye a écrit :As for the DLLs, it's supposed to be OK to simply copy them to the same directory as your executable.$Sure, but then, you need to duplicate the dll files for every project that uses gsl !You shouldn't have to put them in your system folder (nor is that generally encouraged).Hmm, I have an opposite point of view, but doesn't matter.
FYI I have updated this installer to produce static as well as shared libraries. So now, if you don't want to ship one more DLL with your program, you don't have to, you can just statically link, and (IIUIC) the linker will only include the parts of GSL that you actually used.
Licensing... can anyone tell me what the correct thing to do in this case is? I am distributing FOSS packages licensed under GNU and they contain statically linked bits of GSL, also licensed under GSL. What do I have to do to correctly and legally acknowledge this fact?
Cheers JP
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |