[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gsl] GSL 2.4 make check failing on Rocks cluster running CentO
From: |
Eric Shell |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gsl] GSL 2.4 make check failing on Rocks cluster running CentOS 6.9 |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:05:38 -0800 |
Hi Patrick,
Thanks much for the quick reply! I incremented the tolerance value, but it
is still failing even at TEST_TOL6:
======================================
gsl 2.4: specfunc/test-suite.log
======================================
# TOTAL: 1
# PASS: 0
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
.. contents:: :depth: 2
FAIL: test
==========
FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j2_e(1048576.0, &r) [168]
expected: -3.1518539455252412e-07
obtained: -3.1518539455252539e-07 +/- 2.7994086564622246e-22
(rel=8.88178e-16)
fracdiff: 2.0155588470164931e-15
tolerance: 2.3283064365386963e-10
value/expected not consistent within reported error
-3.151853945525253879e-07 2.799408656462224591e-22
FAIL: Bessel Functions [407]
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Patrick Alken <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like its calculating the value correctly, but the test
> tolerance needs to be relaxed slightly. Can you locate this line in
> specfun/test_bessel.c:
>
> 186 TEST_SF(s, gsl_sf_bessel_j2_e, (1048576.0, &r),
> -3.1518539455252413111e-07, TEST_TOL3, GSL_SUCCESS);
>
> and change the TEST_TOL3 to TEST_TOL4, and let me know if the test passes?
> If not try TEST_TOL5 and then TEST_TOL6, and tell me which one allows the
> test to pass.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
>
> On 01/18/2018 03:56 PM, Eric Shell wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to install GSL 2.4 on a Rocks cluster running CentOS 6.9, gcc
>> version 4.4.7. I am running configure with just a --prefix argument.
>> make
>> succeeds without errors, but make check is failing on the specfunc test.
>> Here are the contents of the log file:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------
>>
>> ======================================
>> gsl 2.4: specfunc/test-suite.log
>> ======================================
>>
>> # TOTAL: 1
>> # PASS: 0
>> # SKIP: 0
>> # XFAIL: 0
>> # FAIL: 1
>> # XPASS: 0
>> # ERROR: 0
>>
>> .. contents:: :depth: 2
>>
>> FAIL: test
>> ==========
>>
>> FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j2_e(1048576.0, &r) [168]
>> expected: -3.1518539455252412e-07
>> obtained: -3.1518539455252539e-07 +/- 2.7994086564622246e-22
>> (rel=8.88178e-16)
>> fracdiff: 2.0155588470164931e-15
>> tolerance: 4.5474735088646412e-13
>> value/expected not consistent within reported error
>> -3.151853945525253879e-07 2.799408656462224591e-22
>> FAIL: Bessel Functions [407]
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------
>>
>> Is this a known issue? How can I address the underlying issue?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Eric
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Eric Shell
BSOE Technical Staff
address@hidden
831 459 4919
Baskin Engineering, Room 313