[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xkblayout-state
From: |
Chris Marusich |
Subject: |
Re: xkblayout-state |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:06:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:15:23PM +0000, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
>> Sorry if I misunderstood, the intention of the author is clearly to licence
>> the work as gpl, but some files are missing the gpl clause. Also a copy of
>> the license is omitted. It is mandated by term 1 of gpl. If this partial
>> application of gpl makes this a free software, then sorry for the noise. In
>> case this software is ok for upstream, and is not packaged yet, then I
>> would be happy to contribute a package.
>
> Many (if not most) of our packages omit some license headers, so I don't
> think we should count that as a blocker.
>
> As for the missing LICENSE file, that's also suboptimal, but as you say,
> the author clearly intends to distribute the work as GPL2+.
>
> One could ask the author the include the LICENSE file, but I think we
> can go ahead with adding the software to Guix as it is now.
>
> What do you think? And others, do you think it's okay to go ahead with
> packaging this program?
As you said, it seems clear that the author intended this to be GPLv2+.
The REAMDE.md file states:
License
-------
*xkblayout-state* is free software: you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version.
*xkblayout-state* is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
General Public License for more
details. <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>
I agree with Leo: I think it's reasonable to take the author at their
word and package this as GPLv2+. At the same time, Gábor is also right:
to eliminate any shadow of doubt, the author should probably follow the
advice that Gábor gave. Whoever packages the software should probably
contact the author and give them a friendly reminder about that.
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- xkblayout-state, Jone, 2018/04/25
- Re: xkblayout-state, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Jone, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Leo Famulari, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Leo Famulari, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/04/26
- Re: xkblayout-state, Leo Famulari, 2018/04/27
- Re: xkblayout-state, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/04/27
- Re: xkblayout-state,
Chris Marusich <=