Re: Heap space when building SBCL packages

[Konrad Hinsen]

Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> writes:

> You could also try playing with the
> `--dynamic-space-size` command line flag, e.g.
>
>   sbcl --dynamic-space-size 2048 ...

That was a good idea. It turns out that 1024 is just a bit too low to do
program-op, though load-system works. With 1280 I can do program-op on
numcl.

So it looks like SBCL 2.0.2 just needs a bit of extra memory compared to
older versions. Guillaume's suggestion of increasing the limit should
thus be sufficient.

Cheers,
  Konrad.