[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a worka
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:48:35 +0100 |
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 09:30, Wiktor Żelazny <wz@freeshell.de> wrote:
> I will retry now my attempts to fix the r-foreign problem with
> --no-substitutes added.
I guess it will not change your problem at hand: the missing tarball.
If I understand correctly, your initial message describes 2 issues:
- hash mismatch
- substitutes error
About the hash mismatch, game over with time-machine. Well, you have to
do the “time-machine” by hand where the simplest IMHO is what I proposed.
The substitutes error seems transient. Rebuild locally all you need vs
wait the fix: I do not know what would be the fastest. :-)
All the best,
simon
- guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?,
zimoun <=
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/15
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/15
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/18
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/18
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/20