[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a worka
From: |
Wiktor Żelazny |
Subject: |
Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround? |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:11:58 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:57:32AM +0100, Wiktor Żelazny wrote:
> $ guix time-machine --commit=d81fb2ae9443994ae5dd1cb5837276fad63f842c
> --channels=channel-specs.scm -- \
> build --with-source=r-foreign=foreign_0.8-75.tar.gz r-foreign
> /gnu/store/jvh9zyym3xmzy94g37gx5klg8rx72vfj-r-foreign-75
A step forward:
$ guix time-machine --commit=d81fb2ae9443994ae5dd1cb5837276fad63f842c
--channels=channel-specs.scm -- \
build --with-source=r-foreign@0.8-75=foreign_0.8-75.tar.gz r-foreign@0.8-75
results in a path with the correct version. However, subsequent `guix
time-machine -- environment` ignores is, downloads the source from CRAN,
and complaints about the hash.
WŻ
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, (continued)
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Leo Famulari, 2021/01/13
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/14
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/15
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/15
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/18
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?,
Wiktor Żelazny <=
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/20
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, Wiktor Żelazny, 2021/01/22
- Re: guix time-machine, broken hash in an old package definition, a workaround?, zimoun, 2021/01/22