[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guix system vm, QEMU, virtfs, and the security_model option
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: guix system vm, QEMU, virtfs, and the security_model option |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:55:04 +0300 |
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:15:33PM +0100, Fabio Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A quick question re the 'guix system vm' command. When used in
> combination with '--share=/foo=/bar', the command takes advantage of
> QEMU's 'virtfs' option to share a folder between the host and the guest.
>
> Interestingly, the command makes use of the 'security_model=none'
> option. An alternative, one that I've seen recommended in some QEMU
> docs⁰, would be using 'security_model=mapped-xattr'.
>
> Is there any particular reason why we're using 'none' instead of
> 'mapped-xattr'? The reason I'm asking is because I'm struggling with
> some permission issues on a shared folder and I'd have a vague intuition
> (or some hope) that 'mapped-xattr' might be a solution.
>
It looks like it was set in April 2014, so it may be time to revisit
it and see if changing the security_model works.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: guix system vm, QEMU, virtfs, and the security_model option,
Efraim Flashner <=
- Re: guix system vm, QEMU, virtfs, and the security_model option, Brian O'Keefe, 2024/06/02
- Re: guix system vm, QEMU, virtfs, and the security_model option, Fabio Natali, 2024/06/05