[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,....
From: |
Werner Koch |
Subject: |
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,.... |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 12:33:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:20:56 +0100, Neal H Walfield said:
> Personally, I think this is all absolutely silly: first off, an
> X-RBL-Warning header is added to all mail coming from gnu.org lists
This works perfectly. The uk-crypto ML uses the same, well I have to
allow a few poster which are sometimes behind an open relais but this
is not a problem with that ML because it has very good anti-spamming
procedures.
> mail with the ks_c_5601-1987 encoding used in the subject. Looking at
Good idea; just added.
However, setting mailman to require explicit recipients is a Good
Thing - there is no problem with this: The ML is public anyway and a
Bcc to the list is therefore silly. Most spam gets filtered our with
this rule.
Werner
--
Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
- Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Bob Wilkinson, 2001/12/19
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Morten Poulsen, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Ottavio Campana, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Neal H Walfield, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Ottavio Campana, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Gerhard Muntingh, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Bruno A . C . Ferreira, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Michele Dalla Silvestra, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Morten Poulsen, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Kristian Rink, 2001/12/20
- Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,...., Stefan Karrmann, 2001/12/20
- Prev by Date:
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,....
- Next by Date:
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,....
- Previous by thread:
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,....
- Next by thread:
Re: Spam, Spam, Spam,....
- Index(es):