[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:29:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ok, so the store runs handling should rather be in each class and
> store_set_size () would just call the set_size () method and nothing more.
I have not thought yet about how runs should be handled for this.
> Regarding the function name, the reason for choosing store_set_size () is
> because it is close to file_set_size, the analogous function in the Hurd fs
> interface.
Good point.
> OTOH, it would be called only for truncating files (enlarging files
> can be done by calling store_write)
Oha, you should read up what truncate() does again.
> and also POSIX have truncate and
> ftruncate.
set_size is a good name, probably better than the confusing truncate from
POSIX.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org marcus@gnu.org
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, (continued)
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek, 2002/09/09
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Niels Möller, 2002/09/09
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/09/10
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/09/10
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/09/10
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/09/12
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Clemmitt Sigler, 2002/09/12
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Jeff Bailey, 2002/09/12
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/09/12
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/09/12
- Re: Gunzip and bunzip2 stores,
Marcus Brinkmann <=