[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:56:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120805 Icedove/10.0.6 |
On 10/09/2012 08:58 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> There isn't a formal standard reserving those, but there's a
> convention of using _p for “predicates” (both boolean variables,
> like done_p; and boolean functions, like writable_p (fp).)
> Thus, it may be better to use _ptr or _pt instead.
Didn't like any of those. I just dropped the _t.
regards,
Nikos
- "_t" type names, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/10/08
- Re: "_t" type names, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/10/09
- "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/10/09
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Simon Josefsson, 2012/10/11
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/10/11
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Simon Josefsson, 2012/10/15
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Ivan Shmakov, 2012/10/16
- Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives, Simon Josefsson, 2012/10/16