[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:23:18 -0400 |
"Paul D. Smith" wrote:
>
> %% "Robert Mecklenburg" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> In this case you can just use $*.
>
> rm> I don't understand.
>
> You're right; that was my brain on drugs.
I've simplified the rule to:
.PRECIOUS: %/../...
%/../...:
mkdir -p $(dir $*) && : >> $(dir $*)$(@F)
which resolves to the exact same thing the previous complex expression did.
Thanks,
Noel
--
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.
- exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Noel Yap, 2003/10/16
- Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Noel Yap, 2003/10/16
- Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/16
- Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Noel Yap, 2003/10/16
- Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/16
- Re: exception to Paul's Second Rule?, Noel Yap, 2003/10/17
- wildcard recursive?!, Sylvain Becker, 2003/10/17
- Re: wildcard recursive?!, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/17
- Re: wildcard recursive?!, Dan Kegel, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Sylvain Becker, 2003/10/17
- RE: wildcard recursive?!, Paul D. Smith, 2003/10/17