[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flexible include (was: Re: adding functions to function.c
From: |
Boris Kolpackov |
Subject: |
Re: Flexible include (was: Re: adding functions to function.c |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.6.5+RFC1522 |
Alessandro Vesely <address@hidden> writes:
> Included makefile can have prerequisites that in turn need to be built
> That may also happen in non-bootstrap situations, e.g. if one generates
> dependencies in some complicated way that requires a specific order.
>
> Sometimes $(eval) can be used to include dependencies after they have
> been generated. Some other times it is either too hard or plainly
> unfeasible to do so and one has to resort to a recursive call. I think
> the latter is what Boris calls a "qualitative difference".
>
> Would it be a feasible and useful to have a delayed include? I mean
> to consider the include-file as a regular target but only include it
> after it has been either rebuilt or diagnosed up to date.
I don't see what exactly you are trying to achieve. Maybe you could
create a small example that shows your problem.
- Re: adding functions to function.c, (continued)