[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interpretation of "make -p"
From: |
William_Morris JWA |
Subject: |
Re: Interpretation of "make -p" |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:08:58 +0100 |
Hello
Thanks for the reply. But I am not really convinced.
For example, in the following:
# Not a target:
partab-test.d:
# A default or MAKEFILES makefile.
# Implicit rule search has been done.
# File does not exist.
# File has been updated.
# Failed to be updated.
The .d file is a dependency list being 'include'ed.
The 3rd line is a mystery. The last two lines are
contradictory.
Or in:
# Not a target:
partab-test: partab-test.o
# Command-line target.
# Implicit rule search has been done.
# Implicit/static pattern stem: `partab'
...
Why is partab-test both "not a target" and also the
"Command-line target".
Or things like:
# Directories
# /vobs/.../test/SCCS: could not be stat'd.
# SCCS: could not be stat'd.
# /vobs/.../test/../test/../srce//RCS: could not be stat'd.
# /vobs/.../test (device 52429110, inode 195): 7 files,
20 impossibilities.
# /vobs/.../test/../test (device 52429110, inode 195):
7 files, 20 impossibilities.
# /vobs/.../test/../incl/RCS: could not be stat'd.
Ok SCCS and RCS directories don't exist, and there were 7
files in the directory, but what are the impossibilities ?
Its these sorts of thing that always puzzle me whenever
I try to work out why make is not doing what I expect.
Thanks again
--
William Morris
NB. GNU Make version 3.79.1, built for sparc-sun-solaris2.6