|
From: | Greg Chicares |
Subject: | Re: Choice between gnu make and other like utilities |
Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:20:13 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
On 2006-1-31 4:36 UTC, Peng Yu wrote: > > There are several supplements/replacements to make. Like "cook" > http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/cook/cook.html, "makemake" > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A//www.fortran.com/makemake.perl&ei=t_XbQ4a8I4b-sgGYpoj_Ag&sig2=mNsG8neskwXrVofF0Ot6bw, > "makepp" > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%3A//makepp.sourceforge.net/&ei=6fXbQ-q0LpGIsgG3-c3yBw&sig2=3tGerEEkdRYWfi0ueEQkFw > Maybe there are some others. They are legion: http://www.linuxlinks.com/Software/Programming/Development/Tools/Make_Tools/index.shtml > Do you know the pros and cons of them? Do you have any suggestions on > using them? Here are some discussions of make alternatives: http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/1715/ http://unix.freshmeat.net/articles/view/889/ http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/27/2259253
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |