[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Static Rules Unceremoniously Dropped
From: |
William Ahern |
Subject: |
RE: Static Rules Unceremoniously Dropped |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:15:22 -0800 |
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:44 -0800, Martin Dorey wrote:
> (
> As documented in info make, 10.5.1:
>
> `%' in a prerequisite of a pattern rule stands for the same stem
> that was matched by the `%' in the target. In order for the pattern
> rule to apply, its target pattern must match the file name under
> consideration, and its prerequisite patterns must name files that exist
> or can be made.
> )
Hmmm. That explains that, then. Thanx.
--
William Ahern <address@hidden>
--------------------------------------------------
This message was scanned for Spam, Spyware and Viruses
For more information, please visit:
http://www.barracudanetworks.com