[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba
From: |
CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM |
Subject: |
RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:54:17 -0000 |
Hi Paul,
I fixed the problem, with your help.
> As I said, GIVEN THE ABOVE MAKEFILE. If it's not working,
> then there's
> more to your makefiles than you've shown.
>
> If the target is ../idl/a.h, then you have somewhere in your
> makefile a
> prerequisite statement that asks make to build ../idl/a.h.
You were right. We had a "defs" file which was generating the
targets from the idls like this:
IDL_HEADERS = $(subst .idl,.h,$(IDL_FILES))
so ../idl/a.idl would become target ../idl/a.h; my fix is:
IDL_HEADERS_TMP = $(subst .idl,.h,$(IDL_FILES))
IDL_HEADERS = $(subst ../idl/,,$(IDL_HEADERS_TMP))
There maybe a more elegant way of fixing this with one command,
but that works beautifully!
> As I said, we don't have time to debug your entire make
> environment. If
> you can't describe it completely you'll have to generate a small,
> self-contained test case that shows the problem and we can
> look at that.
> In my experience just going through that exercise will often show you
> what the problem is.
I built a small test case, and sure enough it behaved just like you said
it would (not that I ever disbelieved you!) Then with the help of make -p
I saw that the rule invoked was IDL: ../idl/file.h which led me to look
at the variable after the IDL rule (IDL_HEADERS) then bingo - the subst
rule was found.
> ----- Apropos of not very much, this 23-line signature is incredibly
> annoying... and legally completely useless. The de facto standard
> maximum length for a signature is 4 lines, FWIW :-). At the
> very least
> please reduce the line length to 79 chars or less per line, and please
> use the universal signature introduction character sequence, which is
> dash-dash-space ("-- ") on its own line just before the sig.
The signature is automated and I have no control over it - it is appended
to every message I send.
I couldn't agree with you more on every point and I've read the RFC.
The trouble is we are the UK's biggest financial institution, with over
130,000 employees. Suggesting that we change legal notices will be a
complete waste of time for me because they will not listen to a non-legal
person like me. RBS is a big monolithic organsiation and the signature
would have been put in place, like every other bank has done, after legal
discussion which would not have included anyone party to such rules as
the four line rule. I could literally spend weeks even tracking down
the right person to speak to, let alone convincing them that it was
right to change it.
Other lists have overcome this problem (for RBS are not alone in this crime)
by looking for "--LongSig" and strip off everything after that. It would
be easier for the maintainers of this list (or this list's software) to
adopt this practice.
Thanks again, much appreciated,
David Carter-Hitchin.
--
--LongSig
***********************************************************************************
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered
Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the
addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other
than the addressee, please return the message to the sender
by replying to it and then delete the message from your
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The
Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for
changes made to this message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this
message and any attachments will not adversely affect its
systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal
Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry
out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
Visit our websites at:
http://www.rbos.com
http://www.rbsmarkets.com
********************************************************************************
- Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 2006/02/13
- RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 2006/02/13
- RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 2006/02/13
- RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba, CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM, 2006/02/13
- RE: Tricky suffix rule problem for Corba,
CARTER-HITCHIN, David, FM <=